If a patient does not return the release of records form, what is assumed?

• A. No authorization is implied
• B. Authorization is revoked
• C. Authorization is implied
• D. They do not want their records transferred

Answer: (C)

Implied authorization allows disclosures of patient information for treatment and care coordination even when there isn’t a signed release on file. When a patient seeks care, the practice is allowed to share necessary records with other treating providers and entities involved in that care under HIPAA and standard medical ethics. The release form is a written document to formalize permission, but its absence doesn’t block needed disclosures for treatment or to ensure continuity of care.

So, if a patient does not return the release of records form, it’s understood that authorization is implied for the purposes of treatment, payment, and care coordination. This isn’t about the patient avoiding transfer; it’s about permission being inferred from the patient’s engagement in care.

The other options don’t fit because they suggest either no authorization, revocation, or a stated refusal to transfer, none of which is supported by the situation of a patient who has begun treatment and may rely on records being shared to receive appropriate care.